Phlogopite Zema M, Ventruti G, Lacalamita M, Scordari F American Mineralogist 95 (2010) 1458-1466 Kinetics of Fe-oxidation/deprotonation process in Fe-rich phlogopite under isothermal conditions Locality: Mt. Vulture, Potenza, Italy Sample: SA1_9 _database_code_amcsd 0017712 CELL PARAMETERS: 5.3379 9.2414 10.2311 90.000 100.023 90.000 SPACE GROUP: C2/m X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838 Cell Volume: 496.994 Density (g/cm3): 2.902 MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 9.427614869 RIR: 1.058 RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739 2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity 8.78 100.00 10.0750 0 0 1 2 19.21 11.74 4.6207 0 2 0 2 19.43 13.35 4.5690 1 1 0 4 20.09 2.08 4.4203 -1 1 1 4 21.15 2.93 4.2000 0 2 1 4 22.55 18.13 3.9428 1 1 1 4 24.24 38.39 3.6720 -1 1 2 4 26.17 43.50 3.4052 0 2 2 4 26.54 48.74 3.3583 0 0 3 2 28.29 37.49 3.1551 1 1 2 4 30.56 24.04 2.9254 -1 1 3 4 32.97 13.13 2.7166 0 2 3 4 33.71 2.32 2.6586 -2 0 1 2 33.72 4.87 2.6577 1 3 0 4 34.11 31.32 2.6282 2 0 0 2 34.12 62.44 2.6275 -1 3 1 4 35.49 5.87 2.5295 1 1 3 4 35.65 8.33 2.5187 0 0 4 2 36.81 14.09 2.4414 2 0 1 2 36.82 27.95 2.4409 -1 3 2 4 38.10 1.93 2.3620 -1 1 4 4 38.98 1.70 2.3103 0 4 0 2 39.09 3.52 2.3044 -2 2 1 4 39.44 5.26 2.2845 2 2 0 4 39.70 4.23 2.2704 -2 0 3 2 39.71 8.58 2.2696 1 3 2 4 40.04 6.20 2.2519 0 4 1 4 40.83 5.85 2.2101 -2 2 2 4 41.42 13.71 2.1798 2 0 2 2 41.43 27.40 2.1795 -1 3 3 4 41.85 3.91 2.1586 2 2 1 4 43.07 1.54 2.1000 0 4 2 4 44.99 7.06 2.0150 0 0 5 2 45.33 7.69 2.0007 -2 0 4 2 45.34 15.04 2.0002 1 3 3 4 47.49 2.28 1.9143 2 0 3 2 47.50 4.60 1.9142 -1 3 4 4 52.19 1.45 1.7528 1 3 4 4 53.88 3.30 1.7017 1 5 1 4 54.66 1.70 1.6792 0 0 6 2 54.69 10.92 1.6784 2 0 4 2 54.69 21.58 1.6784 -1 3 5 4 54.70 4.66 1.6781 2 4 1 4 54.70 1.00 1.6779 -1 5 2 4 55.68 4.93 1.6508 -3 1 3 4 55.68 1.78 1.6507 3 1 1 4 56.86 2.57 1.6194 -2 4 3 4 56.87 3.78 1.6191 1 5 2 4 58.19 2.65 1.5855 2 4 2 4 58.19 2.19 1.5854 -1 5 3 4 59.65 1.39 1.5501 -3 1 4 4 59.66 1.52 1.5499 3 1 2 4 59.99 6.31 1.5420 -2 0 6 2 60.01 12.71 1.5417 1 3 5 4 60.05 25.61 1.5407 -3 3 1 4 60.07 12.72 1.5402 0 6 0 2 60.82 2.99 1.5231 -3 3 2 4 60.82 2.92 1.5230 3 3 0 4 60.84 2.94 1.5225 0 6 1 4 61.67 1.19 1.5041 1 1 6 4 62.80 1.36 1.4796 2 0 5 2 62.80 2.78 1.4796 -1 3 6 4 64.77 1.74 1.4393 0 0 7 2 64.92 1.29 1.4365 -1 1 7 4 66.34 1.64 1.4091 2 2 5 4 66.80 1.21 1.4005 -3 3 4 4 66.81 1.22 1.4003 3 3 2 4 66.82 1.19 1.4000 0 6 3 4 68.68 5.99 1.3666 -2 0 7 2 68.70 11.83 1.3663 1 3 6 4 69.16 2.29 1.3583 0 4 6 4 70.66 1.10 1.3332 -4 0 1 2 70.68 2.16 1.3327 -2 6 1 4 70.89 3.72 1.3293 -4 0 2 2 70.92 7.60 1.3289 2 6 0 4 71.82 3.80 1.3144 -3 3 5 4 71.83 3.78 1.3143 3 3 3 4 71.84 3.81 1.3140 0 6 4 4 72.07 2.71 1.3104 -2 2 7 4 72.54 2.43 1.3031 -4 0 3 2 72.57 4.71 1.3027 2 6 1 4 74.41 1.54 1.2749 4 0 1 2 74.43 3.07 1.2746 -2 6 3 4 75.11 2.36 1.2648 2 2 6 4 75.17 1.09 1.2640 4 2 0 4 75.49 1.63 1.2594 0 0 8 2 75.89 1.92 1.2537 -1 7 2 4 76.71 2.27 1.2423 -3 5 3 4 77.70 1.73 1.2290 4 2 1 4 78.26 1.34 1.2216 0 4 7 4 78.87 1.05 1.2137 -1 7 3 4 79.94 1.11 1.2000 2 6 3 4 85.55 2.95 1.1352 -4 0 6 2 85.58 5.83 1.1348 2 6 4 4 ================================================================================ XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.