Fluorophlogopite Scordari F, Schingaro E, Ventruti G, Nicotra E, Viccaro M, Tagliani S M American Mineralogist 98 (2013) 1017-1025 Fluorophlogopite from Piano delle Concazze (Mt. Etna, Italy): Crystal chemistry and implications for the crystallization conditions Note: Sample E0 Locality: Piano delle Concazze, Mt. Etna, Italy _database_code_amcsd 0020180 CELL PARAMETERS: 5.3192 9.2181 10.1096 90.000 100.168 90.000 SPACE GROUP: C2/m X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838 Cell Volume: 487.918 Density (g/cm3): 2.968 MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 11.57045605 RIR: 1.269 RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739 2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity 8.89 100.00 9.9508 0 0 1 2 19.26 7.55 4.6090 0 2 0 2 19.50 12.20 4.5526 1 1 0 4 20.17 4.07 4.4035 -1 1 1 4 22.69 7.31 3.9186 1 1 1 4 24.39 23.29 3.6493 -1 1 2 4 26.36 37.17 3.3812 0 2 2 4 26.88 39.11 3.3169 0 0 3 2 28.54 34.38 3.1281 1 1 2 4 30.82 24.19 2.9012 -1 1 3 4 33.28 10.67 2.6922 0 2 3 4 33.82 7.32 2.6500 1 3 0 4 33.83 3.49 2.6494 -2 0 1 2 34.23 41.29 2.6197 -1 3 1 4 34.25 21.08 2.6178 2 0 0 2 35.84 1.15 2.5057 1 3 1 4 35.86 3.76 2.5041 1 1 3 4 36.11 3.28 2.4877 0 0 4 2 36.98 32.41 2.4308 -1 3 2 4 37.02 16.30 2.4284 2 0 1 2 39.09 2.43 2.3045 0 4 0 2 39.22 4.01 2.2969 -2 2 1 4 39.59 4.50 2.2763 2 2 0 4 39.93 2.33 2.2579 -2 0 3 2 39.95 4.64 2.2568 1 3 2 4 40.17 3.47 2.2451 0 4 1 4 40.99 3.26 2.2018 -2 2 2 4 41.68 21.02 2.1670 -1 3 3 4 41.73 10.58 2.1646 2 0 2 2 42.06 2.02 2.1484 2 2 1 4 43.27 1.40 2.0911 0 4 2 4 45.58 6.45 1.9902 0 0 5 2 45.66 4.12 1.9870 -2 0 4 2 45.69 8.29 1.9857 1 3 3 4 47.86 4.29 1.9005 -1 3 4 4 47.92 2.14 1.8984 2 0 3 2 49.99 1.11 1.8246 -2 2 4 4 52.10 1.61 1.7553 2 2 3 4 54.06 1.10 1.6962 1 5 1 4 54.26 1.14 1.6906 0 4 4 4 54.93 2.34 1.6716 2 4 1 4 55.19 20.16 1.6644 -1 3 5 4 55.25 9.97 1.6627 2 0 4 2 55.40 1.07 1.6585 0 0 6 2 55.93 3.79 1.6440 -3 1 3 4 55.97 2.00 1.6428 3 1 1 4 57.11 2.80 1.6128 -2 4 3 4 57.13 3.36 1.6124 1 5 2 4 58.46 2.45 1.5787 -1 5 3 4 58.50 2.70 1.5778 2 4 2 4 59.98 1.19 1.5424 -3 1 4 4 60.04 1.29 1.5409 3 1 2 4 60.24 10.06 1.5363 0 6 0 2 60.26 20.17 1.5357 -3 3 1 4 60.59 5.35 1.5282 -2 0 6 2 60.64 10.72 1.5272 1 3 5 4 61.03 3.35 1.5184 0 6 1 4 61.04 3.37 1.5180 -3 3 2 4 61.06 3.32 1.5175 3 3 0 4 63.45 1.81 1.4660 -1 3 6 4 65.68 1.36 1.4215 0 0 7 2 67.05 1.06 1.3959 2 2 5 4 69.44 5.00 1.3535 -2 0 7 2 69.50 9.96 1.3526 1 3 6 4 69.88 1.58 1.3461 0 4 6 4 70.91 2.69 1.3291 -2 6 1 4 70.95 1.36 1.3284 -4 0 1 2 71.16 6.53 1.3250 2 6 0 4 71.18 3.19 1.3247 -4 0 2 2 72.27 2.62 1.3074 -3 3 5 4 72.28 2.61 1.3072 0 6 4 4 72.34 2.58 1.3062 3 3 3 4 72.83 1.93 1.2986 -2 2 7 4 72.85 4.63 1.2983 2 6 1 4 72.85 2.27 1.2983 -4 0 3 2 74.74 2.65 1.2702 -2 6 3 4 74.81 1.34 1.2691 4 0 1 2 76.01 1.99 1.2521 2 2 6 4 76.60 1.26 1.2439 0 0 8 2 77.03 1.49 1.2380 -3 5 3 4 78.11 1.26 1.2236 4 2 1 4 79.16 1.37 1.2099 0 4 7 4 80.41 1.49 1.1943 2 6 3 4 86.14 2.52 1.1289 -4 0 6 2 86.19 4.98 1.1284 2 6 4 4 ================================================================================ XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.