Diopside Tribaudino M, Molin G M, Bruno E European Journal of Mineralogy 6 (1994) 77-86 Effect of Al on enstatite solubility in CMAS clinopyroxenes: 2 - Crystal chemical considerations Sample: Di65En20CaTs15, split M2 model _database_code_amcsd 0006531 CELL PARAMETERS: 9.7000 8.8610 5.2580 90.000 106.470 90.000 SPACE GROUP: C2/c X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838 Cell Volume: 433.390 Density (g/cm3): 3.274 MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 9.440670393 RIR: 0.939 RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739 2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity 13.80 1.32 6.4159 1 1 0 4 20.04 3.64 4.4305 0 2 0 2 24.49 1.42 3.6342 1 1 1 4 26.79 22.30 3.3282 0 2 1 4 27.81 31.67 3.2080 2 2 0 4 29.95 100.00 2.9837 -2 2 1 4 30.55 41.96 2.9267 3 1 0 4 30.95 41.37 2.8890 -3 1 1 4 35.15 36.84 2.5530 -1 3 1 4 35.36 3.83 2.5384 -2 0 2 2 35.61 45.73 2.5211 0 0 2 2 36.00 39.31 2.4947 2 2 1 4 39.52 18.33 2.2801 3 1 1 4 40.94 13.30 2.2043 1 1 2 4 40.98 1.48 2.2025 -2 2 2 4 41.20 10.26 2.1912 0 2 2 4 42.26 6.54 2.1386 3 3 0 4 42.57 24.89 2.1238 -3 3 1 4 43.08 7.52 2.0997 -4 2 1 4 43.97 1.33 2.0591 4 2 0 4 44.68 16.00 2.0281 0 4 1 4 44.91 13.53 2.0181 -4 0 2 2 45.35 1.94 2.0000 2 4 0 4 45.53 8.36 1.9924 2 0 2 2 46.23 5.15 1.9637 -1 3 2 4 46.78 2.65 1.9420 -2 4 1 4 49.44 2.15 1.8435 3 3 1 4 50.10 6.53 1.8207 5 1 0 4 50.21 4.07 1.8171 2 2 2 4 50.63 1.98 1.8028 1 3 2 4 51.15 1.88 1.7860 2 4 1 4 52.57 10.77 1.7409 1 5 0 4 53.26 1.65 1.7198 -5 1 2 4 53.98 1.55 1.6985 3 1 2 4 55.02 1.58 1.6690 -2 4 2 4 55.20 4.34 1.6641 0 4 2 4 55.26 6.45 1.6622 -3 1 3 4 56.64 17.80 1.6252 -2 2 3 4 56.95 18.53 1.6170 -5 3 1 4 57.45 4.25 1.6040 4 4 0 4 58.65 1.20 1.5742 5 3 0 4 59.64 3.89 1.5503 6 0 0 2 60.14 4.13 1.5386 3 5 0 4 60.60 5.91 1.5280 -6 0 2 2 61.03 1.70 1.5183 -6 2 1 4 61.43 7.03 1.5093 4 0 2 2 61.81 16.68 1.5009 -1 3 3 4 62.72 2.97 1.4814 2 4 2 4 62.93 7.85 1.4768 0 6 0 2 64.51 2.61 1.4445 -6 2 2 4 65.31 1.50 1.4287 4 2 2 4 65.90 1.66 1.4173 0 6 1 4 66.31 23.03 1.4095 5 3 1 4 66.60 8.63 1.4041 -3 5 2 4 66.92 2.80 1.3983 1 5 2 4 67.82 4.11 1.3818 2 2 3 4 68.39 2.78 1.3717 -2 4 3 4 68.56 1.08 1.3688 -7 1 1 4 70.98 8.52 1.3279 -7 1 2 4 71.63 4.24 1.3174 -5 3 3 4 71.82 3.19 1.3143 6 2 1 4 71.84 1.64 1.3142 7 1 0 4 71.90 1.12 1.3132 5 1 2 4 73.40 5.05 1.2899 -3 1 4 4 73.71 1.80 1.2854 -1 1 4 4 74.30 2.37 1.2765 -2 6 2 4 74.45 9.11 1.2743 0 6 2 4 74.81 2.03 1.2692 -4 0 4 2 75.41 3.44 1.2606 0 0 4 2 75.85 1.45 1.2543 -7 3 1 4 77.02 7.16 1.2382 3 5 2 4 78.89 1.08 1.2134 -7 1 3 4 79.43 1.24 1.2064 1 7 1 4 83.06 1.61 1.1627 8 0 0 2 84.13 3.40 1.1507 -6 0 4 2 88.77 1.66 1.1022 2 2 4 4 ================================================================================ XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.