Staurolite Koch-Muller M, Kahlenberg V, Bubenick W, Gottschalk M European Journal of Mineralogy 10 (1998) 453-460 Crystal-structure refinement of synthetic Fe- and Mg-staurolite by Rietveld analysis of X-ray powder-diffraction data Sample: Fe-staurolite synthesized at 25 kbar _database_code_amcsd 0006727 CELL PARAMETERS: 7.8719 16.6231 5.6583 90.000 90.000 90.000 SPACE GROUP: Ccmm X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838 Cell Volume: 740.419 Density (g/cm3): 3.757 MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 8.205302706 RIR: 0.711 RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739 2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity 10.64 12.00 8.3116 0 2 0 2 12.44 17.85 7.1145 1 1 0 4 20.05 1.39 4.4285 1 1 1 8 21.38 13.12 4.1558 0 4 0 2 22.59 2.02 3.9360 2 0 0 2 25.03 11.34 3.5572 2 2 0 4 25.18 6.64 3.5368 1 3 1 8 27.61 2.94 3.2311 2 0 1 4 29.16 9.42 3.0627 1 5 0 4 29.66 67.08 3.0116 2 2 1 8 31.30 6.88 2.8577 2 4 0 4 31.63 17.11 2.8291 0 0 2 2 32.31 29.69 2.7705 0 6 0 2 33.26 75.16 2.6934 1 5 1 8 33.46 8.27 2.6782 0 2 2 4 34.61 4.42 2.5919 3 1 0 4 35.18 29.52 2.5508 2 4 1 8 37.48 100.00 2.3998 1 3 2 8 37.94 36.44 2.3715 3 3 0 4 38.19 40.73 2.3564 3 1 1 8 39.22 9.21 2.2973 2 0 2 4 39.64 2.87 2.2735 1 7 0 4 39.79 5.92 2.2655 2 6 0 4 41.28 1.00 2.1872 3 3 1 8 42.87 26.55 2.1096 1 7 1 8 45.09 2.69 2.0105 2 4 2 8 45.84 53.22 1.9795 0 6 2 4 46.12 25.79 1.9680 4 0 0 2 46.95 1.95 1.9355 3 5 1 8 49.01 1.19 1.8588 4 0 1 4 51.37 3.51 1.7786 4 4 0 4 51.57 1.95 1.7722 1 7 2 8 52.35 5.61 1.7477 2 8 1 8 53.47 4.09 1.7137 1 9 1 8 54.05 1.59 1.6968 4 4 1 8 54.59 1.07 1.6812 3 7 1 8 54.82 1.82 1.6747 0 8 2 4 55.11 8.58 1.6664 2 2 3 8 55.16 3.49 1.6652 3 5 2 8 55.26 1.86 1.6623 0 10 0 2 57.00 10.21 1.6156 4 0 2 4 57.37 17.71 1.6060 1 5 3 8 57.44 2.45 1.6044 4 6 0 4 58.65 4.90 1.5742 2 4 3 8 58.93 1.90 1.5674 5 1 0 4 59.93 7.64 1.5436 4 6 1 8 60.03 8.65 1.5410 2 8 2 8 60.73 7.39 1.5250 3 1 3 8 61.06 22.43 1.5176 1 9 2 8 61.20 12.47 1.5144 5 3 0 4 61.38 9.12 1.5105 5 1 1 8 61.38 5.91 1.5104 3 9 0 4 61.59 1.03 1.5058 4 4 2 8 62.59 1.14 1.4841 1 11 0 4 62.87 6.23 1.4782 2 10 1 8 63.60 1.80 1.4629 5 3 1 8 64.16 8.30 1.4516 1 7 3 8 65.08 2.62 1.4332 0 10 2 4 66.05 28.82 1.4146 0 0 4 2 67.06 95.73 1.3956 4 6 2 8 67.63 23.05 1.3853 0 12 0 2 68.43 3.51 1.3710 5 1 2 8 69.84 1.04 1.3467 2 10 2 8 71.71 1.69 1.3162 2 8 3 8 72.13 1.34 1.3095 3 11 0 4 73.01 1.63 1.2959 6 2 0 4 74.35 5.08 1.2758 3 11 1 8 74.90 1.20 1.2678 2 4 4 8 75.46 3.13 1.2599 0 6 4 4 76.58 1.39 1.2441 0 12 2 4 78.22 3.53 1.2221 4 6 3 8 78.26 2.88 1.2216 6 4 1 8 78.78 7.83 1.2149 3 3 4 8 79.51 3.20 1.2055 5 1 3 8 80.09 5.68 1.1982 5 9 0 4 80.85 2.50 1.1888 2 10 3 8 81.51 2.67 1.1809 5 3 3 8 83.43 1.38 1.1585 4 10 2 8 84.31 4.25 1.1486 4 0 4 4 85.40 1.16 1.1368 2 14 0 4 85.78 3.08 1.1328 4 12 0 4 86.37 3.00 1.1265 3 13 1 8 87.53 1.92 1.1145 2 14 1 8 88.27 1.10 1.1071 4 4 4 8 ================================================================================ XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.