Nontronite Dainyak L G, Zviagina B B, Rusakov V S, Drits V A European Journal of Mineralogy 18 (2006) 753-764 Interpretation of the nontonite-dehydroxylate Mossbauer spectrum using EFG calculations Locality: Garfield, Washington, USA Sample: Model 2 _database_code_amcsd 0007181 CELL PARAMETERS: 5.2770 9.1400 9.6000 90.000 90.000 90.000 SPACE GROUP: P1 X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838 Cell Volume: 463.025 Density (g/cm3): 2.823 MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 15.99081801 RIR: 1.845 RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739 2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity 9.21 89.81 9.6000 0 0 1 1 19.42 35.91 4.5700 1 1 0 1 19.42 35.91 4.5700 -1 1 0 1 19.42 26.18 4.5700 0 2 0 1 21.54 11.07 4.1263 -1 -1 1 1 21.54 32.30 4.1263 1 1 1 1 21.54 11.07 4.1263 -1 1 1 1 21.54 32.30 4.1263 1 -1 1 1 21.54 6.63 4.1263 0 -2 1 1 21.54 6.63 4.1263 0 2 1 1 26.94 3.62 3.3098 -1 1 2 1 26.94 2.76 3.3098 1 -1 2 1 26.94 3.62 3.3098 -1 -1 2 1 26.94 2.76 3.3098 1 1 2 1 26.94 10.63 3.3098 0 -2 2 1 26.94 10.63 3.3098 0 2 2 1 27.88 68.94 3.2000 0 0 3 1 33.98 2.22 2.6385 2 0 0 1 34.21 4.24 2.6213 -1 1 3 1 34.21 1.96 2.6213 1 -1 3 1 34.21 4.24 2.6213 -1 -1 3 1 34.21 1.96 2.6213 1 1 3 1 34.21 1.99 2.6213 0 2 3 1 34.21 1.99 2.6213 0 -2 3 1 35.28 25.27 2.5442 2 0 1 1 35.28 20.07 2.5442 -1 3 1 1 35.28 20.07 2.5442 -1 -3 1 1 37.47 1.66 2.4000 0 0 4 1 38.95 10.80 2.3122 2 0 2 1 38.95 5.26 2.3122 -2 0 2 1 38.95 12.77 2.3122 -1 3 2 1 38.95 12.77 2.3122 -1 -3 2 1 38.95 6.90 2.3122 1 -3 2 1 38.95 6.90 2.3122 1 3 2 1 39.43 1.16 2.2850 0 4 0 1 40.58 1.58 2.2229 2 -2 1 1 40.58 1.58 2.2229 2 2 1 1 42.55 2.79 2.1248 1 -1 4 1 42.55 2.79 2.1248 1 1 4 1 43.88 3.67 2.0632 -2 -2 2 1 43.88 1.78 2.0632 2 2 2 1 43.88 1.78 2.0632 2 -2 2 1 43.88 3.67 2.0632 -2 2 2 1 43.88 1.06 2.0632 0 -4 2 1 43.88 1.06 2.0632 0 4 2 1 44.51 1.53 2.0357 2 0 3 1 44.51 4.47 2.0357 -2 0 3 1 44.51 1.34 2.0357 -1 3 3 1 44.51 1.34 2.0357 -1 -3 3 1 44.51 4.61 2.0357 1 -3 3 1 44.51 4.61 2.0357 1 3 3 1 48.98 2.60 1.8596 0 -4 3 1 48.98 2.60 1.8596 0 4 3 1 51.47 5.10 1.7754 2 0 4 1 51.47 4.47 1.7754 -1 3 4 1 51.47 4.47 1.7754 -1 -3 4 1 51.64 2.37 1.7701 0 -2 5 1 51.64 2.37 1.7701 0 2 5 1 53.01 1.10 1.7273 -3 1 0 1 53.01 1.10 1.7273 3 1 0 1 53.01 1.03 1.7273 2 4 0 1 53.01 1.03 1.7273 -2 4 0 1 53.01 1.07 1.7273 1 5 0 1 53.01 1.07 1.7273 -1 5 0 1 53.93 1.26 1.7000 3 -1 1 1 53.93 1.26 1.7000 3 1 1 1 53.93 2.66 1.7000 -2 4 1 1 53.93 2.66 1.7000 -2 -4 1 1 53.93 1.10 1.7000 -1 5 1 1 53.93 1.10 1.7000 -1 -5 1 1 56.63 1.28 1.6253 3 -1 2 1 56.63 1.28 1.6253 3 1 2 1 57.61 1.47 1.6000 0 0 6 1 59.55 4.43 1.5525 2 0 5 1 59.55 1.94 1.5525 1 3 5 1 59.55 5.93 1.5525 -1 3 5 1 59.55 1.94 1.5525 1 -3 5 1 59.55 5.93 1.5525 -1 -3 5 1 60.81 5.41 1.5233 -3 3 0 1 60.81 5.41 1.5233 3 3 0 1 60.81 5.66 1.5233 0 6 0 1 61.65 2.05 1.5045 -3 3 1 1 61.65 2.05 1.5045 -3 -3 1 1 61.65 1.44 1.5045 0 -6 1 1 61.65 1.44 1.5045 0 6 1 1 63.26 1.16 1.4700 -2 2 5 1 63.26 1.09 1.4700 2 2 5 1 63.26 1.16 1.4700 -2 -2 5 1 63.26 1.09 1.4700 2 -2 5 1 63.26 1.19 1.4700 0 4 5 1 63.26 1.19 1.4700 0 -4 5 1 66.72 1.16 1.4020 -2 4 4 1 66.72 1.16 1.4020 -2 -4 4 1 68.18 1.45 1.3754 3 -3 3 1 68.18 1.45 1.3754 3 3 3 1 68.18 1.19 1.3754 -3 3 3 1 68.18 1.19 1.3754 -3 -3 3 1 68.18 1.24 1.3754 0 -6 3 1 68.18 1.24 1.3754 0 6 3 1 68.41 1.60 1.3714 0 0 7 1 68.60 4.13 1.3681 -2 0 6 1 68.60 4.64 1.3681 1 -3 6 1 68.60 4.64 1.3681 1 3 6 1 72.06 1.14 1.3106 0 4 6 1 72.06 1.14 1.3106 0 -4 6 1 72.29 3.73 1.3070 -4 0 1 1 72.29 4.72 1.3070 2 -6 1 1 72.29 4.72 1.3070 2 6 1 1 73.65 1.55 1.2861 -3 3 4 1 73.65 1.55 1.2861 -3 -3 4 1 73.66 1.03 1.2861 0 -6 4 1 73.66 1.03 1.2861 0 6 4 1 74.61 3.08 1.2721 4 0 2 1 74.61 2.29 1.2721 -2 6 2 1 74.61 2.29 1.2721 -2 -6 2 1 83.65 1.44 1.1561 -4 0 4 1 83.65 1.91 1.1561 2 6 4 1 83.65 1.91 1.1561 2 -6 4 1 ================================================================================ XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.