Chabazite-Na Mazzi F, Galli E Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Monatshefte 1983 (1983) 461-480 The tetrahedral framework of chabazite Locality: Richmond, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Note: Occupancies invented to match formula and refinement Note: This structure matches the reported bond lengths for C 4b, not C 4a Sample: C 4a, triclinic refinement _database_code_amcsd 0014782 CELL PARAMETERS: 9.4410 9.4344 9.4375 94.214 94.080 94.104 SPACE GROUP: P-1 X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838 Cell Volume: 833.707 Density (g/cm3): 1.533 MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 7.985719849 RIR: 1.696 RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739 2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity 9.42 100.00 9.3890 1 0 0 2 9.42 97.73 9.3842 0 0 1 2 9.43 98.49 9.3808 0 1 0 2 12.81 20.59 6.9130 0 -1 1 2 12.81 19.88 6.9081 -1 1 0 2 12.82 20.22 6.9079 -1 0 1 2 13.85 2.37 6.3962 1 0 1 2 13.85 2.40 6.3939 1 1 0 2 13.87 2.38 6.3870 0 1 1 2 15.92 10.60 5.5676 1 -1 1 2 15.92 10.71 5.5660 -1 -1 1 2 15.94 10.46 5.5589 -1 1 1 2 17.59 40.24 5.0409 1 1 1 2 18.90 1.64 4.6945 2 0 0 2 18.91 1.88 4.6921 0 0 2 2 18.92 1.83 4.6904 0 2 0 2 20.48 14.48 4.3357 0 -1 2 2 20.49 14.28 4.3347 0 -2 1 2 20.49 14.22 4.3342 -2 1 0 2 20.49 14.11 4.3338 -2 0 1 2 20.50 14.19 4.3323 -1 0 2 2 20.50 14.13 4.3318 -1 2 0 2 22.28 2.95 3.9903 1 -2 1 2 22.28 2.87 3.9902 -1 -1 2 2 22.30 3.02 3.9874 -2 1 1 2 22.89 1.34 3.8844 1 -1 2 2 22.90 1.33 3.8842 2 -1 1 2 22.90 1.35 3.8831 -2 -1 1 2 22.90 1.32 3.8829 -1 -2 1 2 22.93 1.27 3.8785 -1 1 2 2 22.93 1.20 3.8780 -1 2 1 2 24.69 10.04 3.6065 2 1 1 2 24.70 9.61 3.6047 1 1 2 2 24.70 9.63 3.6039 1 2 1 2 25.77 4.80 3.4565 0 -2 2 2 25.79 5.00 3.4541 -2 2 0 2 25.79 4.84 3.4540 -2 0 2 2 27.90 1.15 3.1981 2 0 2 2 27.91 1.27 3.1970 2 2 0 2 27.94 1.27 3.1935 0 2 2 2 30.45 13.79 2.9355 -1 -1 3 2 30.45 13.84 2.9352 1 -3 1 2 30.46 13.71 2.9346 -3 1 1 2 30.48 3.15 2.9332 2 1 2 2 30.48 3.11 2.9326 2 2 1 2 30.50 3.16 2.9312 1 2 2 2 30.80 3.32 2.9027 3 0 1 2 30.81 3.23 2.9023 3 1 0 2 30.82 3.25 2.9016 1 0 3 2 30.83 3.19 2.9004 1 3 0 2 30.84 3.14 2.8995 0 1 3 2 30.85 3.17 2.8987 0 3 1 2 33.17 1.58 2.7007 3 1 1 2 33.19 1.74 2.6990 1 1 3 2 33.20 1.71 2.6982 1 3 1 2 34.32 2.23 2.6126 1 -3 2 2 34.32 2.19 2.6126 -1 -2 3 2 34.33 2.16 2.6118 2 -3 1 2 34.34 2.15 2.6118 -2 -1 3 2 34.35 2.13 2.6105 -3 2 1 2 34.35 2.17 2.6104 -3 1 2 2 35.69 1.91 2.5159 3 0 2 2 35.69 1.96 2.5155 2 0 3 2 35.70 1.97 2.5152 3 2 0 2 35.71 1.99 2.5144 2 3 0 2 35.74 1.96 2.5124 0 2 3 2 35.74 1.92 2.5121 0 3 2 2 39.49 1.24 2.2822 -1 -1 4 2 39.49 1.26 2.2820 -4 1 1 2 39.49 1.24 2.2817 1 -4 1 2 48.48 1.89 1.8778 5 0 0 2 48.50 1.84 1.8768 0 0 5 2 48.52 1.82 1.8762 0 5 0 2 50.28 1.07 1.8147 5 0 1 2 50.28 1.08 1.8145 5 1 0 2 50.30 1.13 1.8138 1 0 5 2 50.33 1.10 1.8131 1 5 0 2 50.33 1.08 1.8130 0 1 5 2 50.35 1.06 1.8124 0 5 1 2 52.98 2.15 1.7283 0 -4 4 2 53.02 2.19 1.7270 -4 4 0 2 53.03 2.15 1.7270 -4 0 4 2 54.62 3.07 1.6803 3 3 3 2 69.63 1.23 1.3504 6 2 2 2 69.68 1.28 1.3495 2 2 6 2 69.70 1.25 1.3491 2 6 2 2 70.84 1.55 1.3301 3 -6 3 2 70.85 1.54 1.3301 -3 -3 6 2 70.90 1.53 1.3291 -6 3 3 2 ================================================================================ XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.