Actinolite
Evans B W, Yang H
American Mineralogist 83 (1998) 458-475
Fe-Mg order-disorder in tremolite-actinolite-ferro-actinolite at ambient
and high temperature
Sample: 11B, from Luce Lake, Labrador, Canada in an iron formation
_database_code_amcsd 0001989
CELL PARAMETERS: 9.8910 18.1900 5.2970 90.000 104.540 90.000
SPACE GROUP: C2/m
X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838
Cell Volume: 922.499
Density (g/cm3): 3.233
MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 14.12647455
RIR: 1.423
RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739
2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity
9.72 14.03 9.0950 0 2 0 2
10.44 100.00 8.4723 1 1 0 4
17.29 1.51 5.1274 0 0 1 2
17.31 2.65 5.1225 1 3 0 4
18.12 13.23 4.8946 -1 1 1 4
19.52 12.84 4.5475 0 4 0 2
19.88 1.73 4.4665 0 2 1 4
20.97 3.43 4.2361 2 2 0 4
22.17 1.33 4.0097 1 1 1 4
22.83 9.51 3.8949 -1 3 1 4
26.19 26.22 3.4025 1 3 1 4
27.04 15.22 3.2970 2 4 0 4
28.39 44.07 3.1434 3 1 0 4
30.20 13.74 2.9589 2 2 1 4
31.68 5.95 2.8241 3 3 0 4
32.62 11.16 2.7448 -3 3 1 4
32.88 67.11 2.7244 1 5 1 4
34.22 2.00 2.6205 -1 1 2 4
34.36 25.66 2.6096 0 6 1 4
35.32 36.98 2.5410 -2 0 2 2
37.49 2.75 2.3991 3 5 0 4
37.58 1.62 2.3936 4 0 0 2
38.30 24.13 2.3499 -3 5 1 4
38.59 5.11 2.3328 -4 2 1 4
38.90 1.24 2.3153 1 1 2 4
38.93 4.57 2.3137 -1 7 1 4
39.48 13.96 2.2823 -3 1 2 4
40.67 2.27 2.2182 -2 4 2 4
41.09 3.92 2.1965 1 7 1 4
41.47 21.09 2.1773 2 6 1 4
42.01 1.86 2.1508 -3 3 2 4
44.06 11.43 2.0554 2 0 2 2
44.62 11.40 2.0308 3 5 1 4
44.85 6.90 2.0208 -4 0 2 2
44.99 2.36 2.0151 3 7 0 4
45.69 1.80 1.9856 -3 7 1 4
45.89 2.06 1.9775 1 9 0 4
46.72 1.47 1.9443 -3 5 2 4
46.82 1.06 1.9404 4 2 1 4
47.76 1.48 1.9043 5 1 0 4
48.19 3.24 1.8882 -4 6 1 4
48.47 4.07 1.8780 -1 9 1 4
48.61 1.33 1.8730 2 4 2 4
49.12 1.28 1.8547 -1 7 2 4
49.35 1.43 1.8467 -4 4 2 4
49.95 1.46 1.8260 5 3 0 4
50.15 1.89 1.8190 0 10 0 2
52.20 4.09 1.7524 -5 1 2 4
53.02 2.55 1.7273 -5 5 1 4
54.13 3.70 1.6944 -2 8 2 4
54.25 3.53 1.6909 -1 3 3 4
54.64 1.98 1.6797 0 2 3 4
55.29 15.32 1.6614 4 6 1 4
55.76 3.51 1.6485 4 8 0 4
56.47 9.48 1.6295 1 11 0 4
57.78 3.26 1.5957 6 0 0 2
58.21 13.95 1.5849 -1 5 3 4
59.04 3.40 1.5646 4 0 2 2
60.12 6.03 1.5391 -6 0 2 2
60.26 1.10 1.5357 -3 5 3 4
60.60 1.76 1.5280 1 9 2 4
61.00 11.65 1.5190 -2 6 3 4
61.14 5.76 1.5158 0 12 0 2
61.31 3.79 1.5119 5 5 1 4
62.37 1.69 1.4888 0 6 3 4
62.81 1.69 1.4794 4 4 2 4
62.83 1.39 1.4791 -2 10 2 4
63.34 3.25 1.4682 3 11 0 4
63.85 1.48 1.4579 -6 4 2 4
63.86 1.94 1.4576 -1 7 3 4
64.43 16.35 1.4461 -6 6 1 4
68.30 6.56 1.3734 5 1 2 4
68.81 3.12 1.3644 -5 5 3 4
68.84 2.03 1.3639 7 1 0 4
69.68 4.53 1.3494 1 11 2 4
70.06 1.32 1.3431 5 3 2 4
70.08 3.30 1.3427 -3 11 2 4
70.19 3.56 1.3409 2 6 3 4
71.66 4.99 1.3170 -7 5 1 4
72.02 3.51 1.3112 -1 1 4 4
72.43 1.89 1.3048 0 12 2 4
72.63 7.97 1.3018 -2 12 2 4
73.94 2.49 1.2818 0 0 4 2
74.71 3.15 1.2705 -4 0 4 2
79.52 5.40 1.2053 -5 11 2 4
80.21 1.49 1.1968 8 0 0 2
82.68 2.55 1.1672 2 0 4 2
85.78 1.24 1.1327 7 9 0 4
89.40 1.15 1.0960 3 1 4 4
================================================================================
XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs
For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.