Actinolite
Evans B W, Yang H
American Mineralogist 83 (1998) 458-475
Fe-Mg order-disorder in tremolite-actinolite-ferro-actinolite at ambient
and high temperature
Sample: 12BA, from Bloom Lake, Quebec, Canada in an iron formation
_database_code_amcsd 0001993
CELL PARAMETERS: 9.8860 18.1710 5.2970 90.000 104.610 90.000
SPACE GROUP: C2/m
X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838
Cell Volume: 920.777
Density (g/cm3): 3.242
MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 13.40692515
RIR: 1.347
RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739
2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity
9.73 13.63 9.0855 0 2 0 2
10.45 100.00 8.4649 1 1 0 4
17.30 1.32 5.1257 0 0 1 2
17.33 2.39 5.1175 1 3 0 4
18.12 13.25 4.8953 -1 1 1 4
19.54 12.78 4.5427 0 4 0 2
19.89 1.59 4.4643 0 2 1 4
20.99 3.15 4.2325 2 2 0 4
22.19 1.57 4.0062 1 1 1 4
22.84 9.60 3.8937 -1 3 1 4
26.22 27.96 3.3994 1 3 1 4
27.07 16.10 3.2939 2 4 0 4
28.42 46.41 3.1408 3 1 0 4
30.24 14.48 2.9558 2 2 1 4
31.71 6.29 2.8216 3 3 0 4
32.63 11.78 2.7441 -3 3 1 4
32.91 68.30 2.7217 1 5 1 4
34.22 2.03 2.6205 -1 1 2 4
34.40 27.24 2.6074 0 6 1 4
35.31 39.16 2.5416 -2 0 2 2
37.52 2.87 2.3969 3 5 0 4
37.61 1.72 2.3916 4 0 0 2
38.32 25.00 2.3488 -3 5 1 4
38.61 5.49 2.3322 -4 2 1 4
38.92 1.26 2.3139 1 1 2 4
38.96 4.88 2.3119 -1 7 1 4
39.47 14.16 2.2828 -3 1 2 4
40.68 2.55 2.2181 -2 4 2 4
41.14 3.95 2.1943 1 7 1 4
41.52 21.80 2.1751 2 6 1 4
42.00 2.05 2.1511 -3 3 2 4
42.23 1.02 2.1402 -1 5 2 4
44.10 11.72 2.0536 2 0 2 2
44.67 11.71 2.0287 3 5 1 4
44.84 7.20 2.0212 -4 0 2 2
45.03 2.43 2.0131 3 7 0 4
45.72 1.82 1.9844 -3 7 1 4
45.94 2.23 1.9755 1 9 0 4
46.72 1.54 1.9441 -3 5 2 4
46.87 1.17 1.9383 4 2 1 4
47.80 1.54 1.9027 5 1 0 4
48.22 3.34 1.8872 -4 6 1 4
48.52 4.11 1.8764 -1 9 1 4
48.66 1.34 1.8713 2 4 2 4
49.15 1.31 1.8538 -1 7 2 4
49.35 1.46 1.8467 -4 4 2 4
49.99 1.56 1.8244 5 3 0 4
50.21 1.94 1.8171 0 10 0 2
52.19 4.24 1.7526 -5 1 2 4
53.04 2.51 1.7264 -5 5 1 4
54.15 3.76 1.6936 -2 8 2 4
54.26 3.72 1.6906 -1 3 3 4
54.66 2.08 1.6791 0 2 3 4
55.36 15.87 1.6596 4 6 1 4
55.82 3.57 1.6470 4 8 0 4
56.54 9.51 1.6278 1 11 0 4
57.83 3.29 1.5944 6 0 0 2
58.23 14.19 1.5844 -1 5 3 4
59.11 3.44 1.5629 4 0 2 2
60.12 6.22 1.5391 -6 0 2 2
60.26 1.05 1.5357 -3 5 3 4
60.66 1.82 1.5266 1 9 2 4
61.01 12.06 1.5187 -2 6 3 4
61.21 6.01 1.5142 0 12 0 2
61.39 3.98 1.5103 5 5 1 4
62.40 1.76 1.4881 0 6 3 4
62.87 1.48 1.4782 -2 10 2 4
62.88 1.66 1.4779 4 4 2 4
63.42 3.37 1.4668 3 11 0 4
63.86 1.51 1.4577 -6 4 2 4
63.89 1.97 1.4571 -1 7 3 4
64.47 16.69 1.4453 -6 6 1 4
68.38 6.75 1.3719 5 1 2 4
68.80 3.20 1.3645 -5 5 3 4
68.90 2.09 1.3628 7 1 0 4
69.76 4.67 1.3481 1 11 2 4
70.13 3.26 1.3419 -3 11 2 4
70.15 1.34 1.3416 5 3 2 4
70.25 3.70 1.3399 2 6 3 4
71.70 5.10 1.3163 -7 5 1 4
72.03 3.52 1.3110 -1 1 4 4
72.50 1.83 1.3037 0 12 2 4
72.69 8.21 1.3009 -2 12 2 4
73.97 2.48 1.2814 0 0 4 2
74.69 3.26 1.2708 -4 0 4 2
79.57 5.48 1.2047 -5 11 2 4
80.29 1.45 1.1958 8 0 0 2
82.74 2.60 1.1664 2 0 4 2
85.87 1.22 1.1317 7 9 0 4
89.49 1.19 1.0951 3 1 4 4
================================================================================
XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs
For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.