Actinolite
Evans B W, Yang H
American Mineralogist 83 (1998) 458-475
Fe-Mg order-disorder in tremolite-actinolite-ferro-actinolite at ambient
and high temperature
Sample: C60, 12BA, from Bloom Lake, Quebec, Canada in an iron formation
after heating at 700 C
_database_code_amcsd 0001994
CELL PARAMETERS: 9.9000 18.1980 5.2990 90.000 104.630 90.000
SPACE GROUP: C2/m
X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838
Cell Volume: 923.716
Density (g/cm3): 3.230
MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 13.30585907
RIR: 1.341
RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739
2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity
9.72 14.70 9.0990 0 2 0 2
10.44 100.00 8.4764 1 1 0 4
17.30 1.07 5.1272 0 0 1 2
17.30 2.09 5.1248 1 3 0 4
18.11 14.18 4.8986 -1 1 1 4
19.51 13.04 4.5495 0 4 0 2
19.88 1.83 4.4668 0 2 1 4
20.96 3.53 4.2382 2 2 0 4
22.18 1.35 4.0082 1 1 1 4
22.82 9.15 3.8975 -1 3 1 4
26.19 28.82 3.4021 1 3 1 4
27.03 16.03 3.2986 2 4 0 4
28.38 46.10 3.1450 3 1 0 4
30.21 14.14 2.9581 2 2 1 4
31.67 6.70 2.8255 3 3 0 4
32.59 12.68 2.7478 -3 3 1 4
32.87 68.88 2.7245 1 5 1 4
34.20 1.95 2.6215 -1 1 2 4
34.35 27.27 2.6105 0 6 1 4
35.29 39.11 2.5432 -2 0 2 2
37.47 2.71 2.4002 3 5 0 4
37.56 1.77 2.3948 4 0 0 2
38.27 24.98 2.3521 -3 5 1 4
38.55 5.46 2.3354 -4 2 1 4
38.91 5.07 2.3149 -1 7 1 4
38.91 1.29 2.3147 1 1 2 4
39.44 14.21 2.2848 -3 1 2 4
40.64 2.47 2.2199 -2 4 2 4
41.09 3.97 2.1970 1 7 1 4
41.47 21.99 2.1775 2 6 1 4
41.96 2.15 2.1531 -3 3 2 4
44.08 11.87 2.0546 2 0 2 2
44.62 11.73 2.0308 3 5 1 4
44.79 7.29 2.0234 -4 0 2 2
44.96 2.45 2.0160 3 7 0 4
45.65 1.75 1.9872 -3 7 1 4
45.87 2.36 1.9784 1 9 0 4
46.67 1.41 1.9462 -3 5 2 4
46.82 1.19 1.9403 4 2 1 4
47.74 1.64 1.9053 5 1 0 4
48.15 3.39 1.8899 -4 6 1 4
48.45 4.04 1.8790 -1 9 1 4
48.62 1.40 1.8725 2 4 2 4
49.10 1.35 1.8555 -1 7 2 4
49.29 1.48 1.8488 -4 4 2 4
49.92 1.41 1.8269 5 3 0 4
50.13 1.91 1.8198 0 10 0 2
52.12 4.25 1.7547 -5 1 2 4
52.96 2.48 1.7289 -5 5 1 4
53.90 1.00 1.7011 2 10 0 4
54.09 3.98 1.6955 -2 8 2 4
54.23 3.85 1.6913 -1 3 3 4
54.64 1.99 1.6797 0 2 3 4
55.29 16.05 1.6615 4 6 1 4
55.73 3.72 1.6493 4 8 0 4
56.44 9.65 1.6302 1 11 0 4
57.75 3.35 1.5965 6 0 0 2
58.19 14.44 1.5853 -1 5 3 4
59.06 3.48 1.5640 4 0 2 2
60.03 6.38 1.5411 -6 0 2 2
60.21 1.12 1.5369 -3 5 3 4
60.59 1.86 1.5282 1 9 2 4
60.96 12.10 1.5198 -2 6 3 4
61.11 6.09 1.5165 0 12 0 2
61.31 4.03 1.5120 5 5 1 4
62.36 1.73 1.4889 0 6 3 4
62.79 1.45 1.4799 -2 10 2 4
62.83 1.68 1.4790 4 4 2 4
63.31 3.40 1.4689 3 11 0 4
63.76 1.51 1.4596 -6 4 2 4
63.84 2.03 1.4581 -1 7 3 4
64.37 17.04 1.4473 -6 6 1 4
68.32 6.82 1.3730 5 1 2 4
68.72 3.23 1.3659 -5 5 3 4
68.80 2.06 1.3646 7 1 0 4
69.67 4.74 1.3496 1 11 2 4
70.03 3.33 1.3436 -3 11 2 4
70.08 1.40 1.3427 5 3 2 4
70.20 3.73 1.3407 2 6 3 4
70.92 1.02 1.3288 -5 9 2 4
71.59 5.14 1.3181 -7 5 1 4
72.01 3.64 1.3115 -1 1 4 4
72.40 1.92 1.3052 0 12 2 4
72.58 8.27 1.3025 -2 12 2 4
73.95 2.51 1.2818 0 0 4 2
74.64 3.29 1.2716 -4 0 4 2
79.44 5.56 1.2064 -5 11 2 4
80.16 1.51 1.1974 8 0 0 2
82.71 2.62 1.1668 2 0 4 2
85.73 1.31 1.1333 7 9 0 4
89.45 1.20 1.0956 3 1 4 4
================================================================================
XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs
For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.