Fluorophlogopite
Scordari F, Schingaro E, Ventruti G, Nicotra E, Viccaro M, Tagliani S M
American Mineralogist 98 (2013) 1017-1025
Fluorophlogopite from Piano delle Concazze (Mt. Etna, Italy): Crystal chemistry
and implications for the crystallization conditions
Note: Sample E1
Locality: Piano delle Concazze, Mt. Etna, Italy
_database_code_amcsd 0020181
CELL PARAMETERS: 5.3239 9.2204 10.1192 90.000 100.185 90.000
SPACE GROUP: C2/m
X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838
Cell Volume: 488.909
Density (g/cm3): 2.964
MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 11.60538027
RIR: 1.275
RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739
2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity
8.88 100.00 9.9597 0 0 1 2
19.25 7.43 4.6102 0 2 0 2
19.48 11.39 4.5557 1 1 0 4
20.15 4.22 4.4071 -1 1 1 4
22.68 7.25 3.9211 1 1 1 4
24.37 23.73 3.6526 -1 1 2 4
26.34 37.03 3.3831 0 2 2 4
26.85 39.12 3.3199 0 0 3 2
28.52 34.70 3.1302 1 1 2 4
30.79 23.89 2.9040 -1 1 3 4
33.26 10.64 2.6941 0 2 3 4
33.80 3.42 2.6518 -2 0 1 2
33.81 7.15 2.6511 1 3 0 4
34.21 41.39 2.6208 -1 3 1 4
34.22 21.04 2.6200 2 0 0 2
35.82 1.11 2.5067 1 3 1 4
35.83 3.71 2.5060 1 1 3 4
36.07 3.32 2.4899 0 0 4 2
36.96 31.82 2.4321 -1 3 2 4
36.99 16.30 2.4303 2 0 1 2
39.08 2.43 2.3051 0 4 0 2
39.19 4.02 2.2987 -2 2 1 4
39.56 4.65 2.2779 2 2 0 4
39.89 2.28 2.2602 -2 0 3 2
39.93 4.60 2.2579 1 3 2 4
40.15 3.55 2.2457 0 4 1 4
40.96 3.24 2.2035 -2 2 2 4
41.65 21.17 2.1684 -1 3 3 4
41.70 10.65 2.1662 2 0 2 2
42.03 2.06 2.1499 2 2 1 4
43.25 1.37 2.0919 0 4 2 4
45.54 6.41 1.9919 0 0 5 2
45.61 4.12 1.9890 -2 0 4 2
45.66 8.34 1.9868 1 3 3 4
47.83 4.32 1.9018 -1 3 4 4
47.88 2.12 1.8998 2 0 3 2
49.94 1.13 1.8263 -2 2 4 4
52.07 1.61 1.7565 2 2 3 4
54.05 1.14 1.6968 1 5 1 4
54.23 1.13 1.6915 0 4 4 4
54.90 2.33 1.6725 2 4 1 4
55.14 20.12 1.6657 -1 3 5 4
55.20 10.03 1.6639 2 0 4 2
55.35 1.09 1.6600 0 0 6 2
55.87 3.84 1.6456 -3 1 3 4
55.93 1.96 1.6441 3 1 1 4
57.07 2.86 1.6138 -2 4 3 4
57.10 3.39 1.6130 1 5 2 4
58.43 2.46 1.5794 -1 5 3 4
58.47 2.67 1.5786 2 4 2 4
59.91 1.18 1.5439 -3 1 4 4
59.99 1.33 1.5421 3 1 2 4
60.22 20.12 1.5368 -3 3 1 4
60.22 10.03 1.5367 0 6 0 2
60.52 5.34 1.5298 -2 0 6 2
60.59 10.71 1.5282 1 3 5 4
60.99 3.37 1.5192 -3 3 2 4
61.01 3.33 1.5188 0 6 1 4
61.02 3.29 1.5186 3 3 0 4
63.40 1.84 1.4672 -1 3 6 4
65.62 1.34 1.4228 0 0 7 2
67.00 1.07 1.3968 2 2 5 4
69.36 4.97 1.3548 -2 0 7 2
69.44 9.91 1.3535 1 3 6 4
69.82 1.56 1.3470 0 4 6 4
70.87 2.67 1.3296 -2 6 1 4
70.88 1.37 1.3296 -4 0 1 2
71.10 3.20 1.3259 -4 0 2 2
71.12 6.55 1.3255 2 6 0 4
72.19 2.65 1.3085 -3 3 5 4
72.24 2.63 1.3077 0 6 4 4
72.29 2.58 1.3070 3 3 3 4
72.75 1.95 1.2999 -2 2 7 4
72.77 2.26 1.2995 -4 0 3 2
72.82 4.59 1.2989 2 6 1 4
74.69 2.65 1.2708 -2 6 3 4
74.74 1.34 1.2701 4 0 1 2
75.94 2.02 1.2530 2 2 6 4
76.52 1.25 1.2450 0 0 8 2
76.97 1.54 1.2388 -3 5 3 4
78.04 1.26 1.2245 4 2 1 4
79.10 1.40 1.2107 0 4 7 4
80.37 1.49 1.1948 2 6 3 4
86.03 2.54 1.1301 -4 0 6 2
86.14 4.97 1.1289 2 6 4 4
================================================================================
XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs
For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.