Fluorophlogopite
Scordari F, Schingaro E, Ventruti G, Nicotra E, Viccaro M, Tagliani S M
American Mineralogist 98 (2013) 1017-1025
Fluorophlogopite from Piano delle Concazze (Mt. Etna, Italy): Crystal chemistry
and implications for the crystallization conditions
Note: Sample E2
Locality: Piano delle Concazze, Mt. Etna, Italy
_database_code_amcsd 0020182
CELL PARAMETERS: 5.3200 9.2138 10.1130 90.000 100.228 90.000
SPACE GROUP: C2/m
X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838
Cell Volume: 487.836
Density (g/cm3): 2.967
MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 11.75008943
RIR: 1.290
RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739
2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity
8.89 100.00 9.9523 0 0 1 2
19.27 7.64 4.6069 0 2 0 2
19.50 12.13 4.5519 1 1 0 4
20.16 4.26 4.4047 -1 1 1 4
22.70 7.04 3.9171 1 1 1 4
24.38 22.89 3.6511 -1 1 2 4
26.36 36.10 3.3806 0 2 2 4
26.87 38.91 3.3174 0 0 3 2
28.55 33.74 3.1269 1 1 2 4
30.80 23.55 2.9028 -1 1 3 4
33.28 10.49 2.6921 0 2 3 4
33.82 3.44 2.6500 -2 0 1 2
33.84 7.08 2.6491 1 3 0 4
34.24 40.70 2.6191 -1 3 1 4
34.26 20.52 2.6177 2 0 0 2
35.85 1.17 2.5046 1 3 1 4
35.87 3.64 2.5033 1 1 3 4
36.10 3.20 2.4881 0 0 4 2
36.98 32.16 2.4307 -1 3 2 4
37.03 16.28 2.4278 2 0 1 2
39.11 2.34 2.3035 0 4 0 2
39.22 3.92 2.2971 -2 2 1 4
39.60 4.43 2.2760 2 2 0 4
39.90 2.32 2.2593 -2 0 3 2
39.97 4.66 2.2558 1 3 2 4
40.18 3.42 2.2441 0 4 1 4
40.98 3.11 2.2023 -2 2 2 4
41.68 20.70 2.1672 -1 3 3 4
41.74 10.33 2.1638 2 0 2 2
42.07 2.04 2.1478 2 2 1 4
43.28 1.36 2.0904 0 4 2 4
45.57 6.31 1.9905 0 0 5 2
45.63 4.07 1.9883 -2 0 4 2
45.71 8.09 1.9849 1 3 3 4
47.85 4.29 1.9008 -1 3 4 4
47.94 2.12 1.8977 2 0 3 2
49.96 1.13 1.8256 -2 2 4 4
52.13 1.62 1.7546 2 2 3 4
54.09 1.06 1.6955 1 5 1 4
54.27 1.13 1.6903 0 4 4 4
54.95 2.26 1.6710 2 4 1 4
55.17 19.92 1.6648 -1 3 5 4
55.27 9.94 1.6621 2 0 4 2
55.39 1.05 1.6587 0 0 6 2
55.90 3.73 1.6448 -3 1 3 4
55.98 1.95 1.6425 3 1 1 4
57.10 2.75 1.6130 -2 4 3 4
57.15 3.35 1.6117 1 5 2 4
58.47 2.40 1.5784 -1 5 3 4
58.53 2.61 1.5771 2 4 2 4
59.94 1.17 1.5433 -3 1 4 4
60.06 1.27 1.5405 3 1 2 4
60.26 19.92 1.5357 -3 3 1 4
60.27 9.94 1.5356 0 6 0 2
60.55 5.29 1.5293 -2 0 6 2
60.65 10.58 1.5268 1 3 5 4
61.03 3.37 1.5182 -3 3 2 4
61.06 3.34 1.5177 0 6 1 4
61.07 3.31 1.5173 3 3 0 4
63.44 1.83 1.4664 -1 3 6 4
65.67 1.35 1.4218 0 0 7 2
67.08 1.04 1.3954 2 2 5 4
69.39 4.99 1.3543 -2 0 7 2
69.51 9.90 1.3523 1 3 6 4
69.88 1.57 1.3460 0 4 6 4
70.93 2.64 1.3287 -2 6 1 4
70.94 1.35 1.3285 -4 0 1 2
71.16 3.17 1.3250 -4 0 2 2
71.19 6.46 1.3245 2 6 0 4
72.23 2.61 1.3080 -3 3 5 4
72.31 2.59 1.3068 0 6 4 4
72.37 2.55 1.3057 3 3 3 4
72.79 1.92 1.2993 -2 2 7 4
72.82 2.30 1.2988 -4 0 3 2
72.89 4.57 1.2978 2 6 1 4
74.75 2.66 1.2700 -2 6 3 4
74.83 1.33 1.2689 4 0 1 2
76.04 1.98 1.2517 2 2 6 4
76.59 1.26 1.2440 0 0 8 2
77.02 1.48 1.2381 -3 5 3 4
78.13 1.23 1.2233 4 2 1 4
79.17 1.36 1.2099 0 4 7 4
80.45 1.50 1.1937 2 6 3 4
86.07 2.52 1.1297 -4 0 6 2
86.23 4.93 1.1279 2 6 4 4
================================================================================
XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs
For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.