Actinolite Evans B W, Yang H American Mineralogist 83 (1998) 458-475 Fe-Mg order-disorder in tremolite-actinolite-ferro-actinolite at ambient and high temperature Sample: C60, 12BA, from Bloom Lake, Quebec, Canada in an iron formation after heating at 700 C _database_code_amcsd 0001994 CELL PARAMETERS: 9.9000 18.1980 5.2990 90.000 104.630 90.000 SPACE GROUP: C2/m X-RAY WAVELENGTH: 1.541838 Cell Volume: 923.716 Density (g/cm3): 3.230 MAX. ABS. INTENSITY / VOLUME**2: 13.30585907 RIR: 1.341 RIR based on corundum from Acta Crystallographica A38 (1982) 733-739 2-THETA INTENSITY D-SPACING H K L Multiplicity 9.72 14.70 9.0990 0 2 0 2 10.44 100.00 8.4764 1 1 0 4 17.30 1.07 5.1272 0 0 1 2 17.30 2.09 5.1248 1 3 0 4 18.11 14.18 4.8986 -1 1 1 4 19.51 13.04 4.5495 0 4 0 2 19.88 1.83 4.4668 0 2 1 4 20.96 3.53 4.2382 2 2 0 4 22.18 1.35 4.0082 1 1 1 4 22.82 9.15 3.8975 -1 3 1 4 26.19 28.82 3.4021 1 3 1 4 27.03 16.03 3.2986 2 4 0 4 28.38 46.10 3.1450 3 1 0 4 30.21 14.14 2.9581 2 2 1 4 31.67 6.70 2.8255 3 3 0 4 32.59 12.68 2.7478 -3 3 1 4 32.87 68.88 2.7245 1 5 1 4 34.20 1.95 2.6215 -1 1 2 4 34.35 27.27 2.6105 0 6 1 4 35.29 39.11 2.5432 -2 0 2 2 37.47 2.71 2.4002 3 5 0 4 37.56 1.77 2.3948 4 0 0 2 38.27 24.98 2.3521 -3 5 1 4 38.55 5.46 2.3354 -4 2 1 4 38.91 5.07 2.3149 -1 7 1 4 38.91 1.29 2.3147 1 1 2 4 39.44 14.21 2.2848 -3 1 2 4 40.64 2.47 2.2199 -2 4 2 4 41.09 3.97 2.1970 1 7 1 4 41.47 21.99 2.1775 2 6 1 4 41.96 2.15 2.1531 -3 3 2 4 44.08 11.87 2.0546 2 0 2 2 44.62 11.73 2.0308 3 5 1 4 44.79 7.29 2.0234 -4 0 2 2 44.96 2.45 2.0160 3 7 0 4 45.65 1.75 1.9872 -3 7 1 4 45.87 2.36 1.9784 1 9 0 4 46.67 1.41 1.9462 -3 5 2 4 46.82 1.19 1.9403 4 2 1 4 47.74 1.64 1.9053 5 1 0 4 48.15 3.39 1.8899 -4 6 1 4 48.45 4.04 1.8790 -1 9 1 4 48.62 1.40 1.8725 2 4 2 4 49.10 1.35 1.8555 -1 7 2 4 49.29 1.48 1.8488 -4 4 2 4 49.92 1.41 1.8269 5 3 0 4 50.13 1.91 1.8198 0 10 0 2 52.12 4.25 1.7547 -5 1 2 4 52.96 2.48 1.7289 -5 5 1 4 53.90 1.00 1.7011 2 10 0 4 54.09 3.98 1.6955 -2 8 2 4 54.23 3.85 1.6913 -1 3 3 4 54.64 1.99 1.6797 0 2 3 4 55.29 16.05 1.6615 4 6 1 4 55.73 3.72 1.6493 4 8 0 4 56.44 9.65 1.6302 1 11 0 4 57.75 3.35 1.5965 6 0 0 2 58.19 14.44 1.5853 -1 5 3 4 59.06 3.48 1.5640 4 0 2 2 60.03 6.38 1.5411 -6 0 2 2 60.21 1.12 1.5369 -3 5 3 4 60.59 1.86 1.5282 1 9 2 4 60.96 12.10 1.5198 -2 6 3 4 61.11 6.09 1.5165 0 12 0 2 61.31 4.03 1.5120 5 5 1 4 62.36 1.73 1.4889 0 6 3 4 62.79 1.45 1.4799 -2 10 2 4 62.83 1.68 1.4790 4 4 2 4 63.31 3.40 1.4689 3 11 0 4 63.76 1.51 1.4596 -6 4 2 4 63.84 2.03 1.4581 -1 7 3 4 64.37 17.04 1.4473 -6 6 1 4 68.32 6.82 1.3730 5 1 2 4 68.72 3.23 1.3659 -5 5 3 4 68.80 2.06 1.3646 7 1 0 4 69.67 4.74 1.3496 1 11 2 4 70.03 3.33 1.3436 -3 11 2 4 70.08 1.40 1.3427 5 3 2 4 70.20 3.73 1.3407 2 6 3 4 70.92 1.02 1.3288 -5 9 2 4 71.59 5.14 1.3181 -7 5 1 4 72.01 3.64 1.3115 -1 1 4 4 72.40 1.92 1.3052 0 12 2 4 72.58 8.27 1.3025 -2 12 2 4 73.95 2.51 1.2818 0 0 4 2 74.64 3.29 1.2716 -4 0 4 2 79.44 5.56 1.2064 -5 11 2 4 80.16 1.51 1.1974 8 0 0 2 82.71 2.62 1.1668 2 0 4 2 85.73 1.31 1.1333 7 9 0 4 89.45 1.20 1.0956 3 1 4 4 ================================================================================ XPOW Copyright 1993 Bob Downs, Ranjini Swaminathan and Kurt Bartelmehs For reference, see Downs et al. (1993) American Mineralogist 78, 1104-1107.